Magnet trading · Nike Industrial Trading[email protected]WhatsApp +852 4607 0157

Magnet materials and specifications

Magnet tolerances and inspection requirements

Specify dimensions after coating and pair each acceptance limit with a measurement method. A dimensional check, a material property report and a pull test qualify different things.

Nike Industrial Trading Updated 24 October 2026

An outside micrometer beside two plated block magnets and an engineering drawing
Product illustration: dimensional inspection tools and finished magnet forms.

Specify the finished, coated part

A dimension can refer to the magnetic substrate, the finished coated part or the assembled component. State which one you mean. Show the units, nominal dimensions, permitted variation, critical surfaces and drawing revision. Identify the dimensions that control the fit instead of assigning an unnecessarily tight tolerance to every feature.

Published supplier tolerances are useful reference information, not an agreement for your part. K&J’s specification page, for example, states its own general tolerance alongside material and surface data. A different geometry, material or finish needs its own confirmation.[1]

A coating stack-up example

Assume a substrate is exactly 20.00 mm across and receives a 20 µm layer on each of two opposite faces. The resulting nominal outside dimension is 20.04 mm before allowing for substrate or coating variation.

The values are illustrative. A finished dimension of 20.00 mm would require a different substrate target and an agreed process; it cannot be achieved by ignoring the coating.

Coating selection also affects bonding, edges and wear. Include the required finish and surface preparation in the same drawing or specification as the fit.[4]

Finished coated surfaces on a drawing compared with the same inspection reference surfaces
Specify and inspect the same finished surfaces. The coating outline and measurement contacts are schematic, not tolerance values.

Use the test that answers the acceptance question

Inspection fields that should stay separate
QuestionSuitable requirement to discussConditions to record
Will it fit?Dimensional and geometric inspectionFinished state, datum, method and limits
Does the material meet the specified magnetic properties?Relevant material characterization or agreed reportMaterial, method, specimen and temperature
Is the field correct here?Gaussmeter or field-map measurementProbe, active-area position, axis, gap and fixture
Is polarity or orientation correct?Pole identification or a specified angle/pattern testPart datum, reference direction and criterion
Will the assembly hold?Defined force test in the relevant assemblySteel, gap, direction, speed and pass criterion

Inspection fields that should stay separate

Will it fit?

Suitable requirement to discuss
Dimensional and geometric inspection
Conditions to record
Finished state, datum, method and limits

Does the material meet the specified magnetic properties?

Suitable requirement to discuss
Relevant material characterization or agreed report
Conditions to record
Material, method, specimen and temperature

Is the field correct here?

Suitable requirement to discuss
Gaussmeter or field-map measurement
Conditions to record
Probe, active-area position, axis, gap and fixture

Is polarity or orientation correct?

Suitable requirement to discuss
Pole identification or a specified angle/pattern test
Conditions to record
Part datum, reference direction and criterion

Will the assembly hold?

Suitable requirement to discuss
Defined force test in the relevant assembly
Conditions to record
Steel, gap, direction, speed and pass criterion

Hall-probe readings depend on position, sensing area and direction. They do not recover every material property from an arbitrary finished shape. Closed-circuit material measurements and magnetic-moment measurements have different purposes and limitations.[2]

Make a result reproducible

Agree the test fixture and reference sample where applicable. For field tests, define the position of the probe’s active area rather than only where the probe casing touches. For force tests, control the target material, contact condition, loading direction and movement; specify repeat measurements and how results are summarized.

Supermagnete describes different calculation and measurement procedures for different product geometries. This illustrates why two supplier numbers should not be compared until their origins and setups are known.[6]

TDK similarly distinguishes material characterization from the product measurements arranged with the customer. A catalogue grade value and a production-part surface reading are not interchangeable acceptance limits.[3]

Example wording for an acceptance discussion

Illustrative record, with open items shown

Part and drawing revision: [reference]. Finished dimensions after coating: [limits and units]. Magnetic direction: [axis and named N face]. Material: [supplier sheet and revision]. Magnetic test: [field component at a defined probe location, or force in a defined fixture]. Sample and batch checks: [agreed method, sampling and acceptance limits].

Replace each bracketed item with an agreed requirement. A blank or undecided field is an open question, not an acceptance limit.

Keep sample and batch records connected

  • Part number, drawing revision and material specification.
  • Sample or lot reference and quantity represented.
  • Required checks, sampling arrangement and acceptance criteria.
  • Method, fixture, instrument and relevant reference conditions.
  • Result, observed exceptions and the approval or corrective action.

Choose any required standard and revision deliberately. The public ASTM A1101 scope covers several distinct dimensions of a sintered NdFeB specification, including material properties, finish and sampling. Reading that scope does not establish conformity, a sampling plan or certification for a supplied part.[5]

Include required reports and traceability in the inquiry so their availability and scope can be confirmed before ordering.

Technical sources

Source material has its own scope and conditions. These references explain technical choices; they are not evidence of our stock, certifications or supplied products.

  1. K&J Magnetics: Neodymium material specifications
  2. Arnold Magnetic Technologies: Magnetic properties and measuring techniques
  3. TDK: NEOREC product guide: materials, measurement and precautions
  4. SM Magnetics / SuperMagnetMan: Coating selection and assembly considerations
  5. ASTM International: ASTM A1101 public abstract and scope
  6. Webcraft / supermagnete: Adhesive-force measurement procedures

Turn the acceptance points into a clear request

Include critical dimensions, reference surfaces, magnetic tests and any required sample or product documents.

Send an inspection requirement